The Self-Sabotage Trap: Why Poor Memory Is More Mental Than You Think
avatar
Guillem Palau
Published at: Mar 27, 2025 

When it comes to memory, many of us quickly assume that our cognitive abilities are fixed, perhaps even predetermined by genetics. However, a growing body of evidence (17,18) and personal testimonies suggest that what we often label as “poor memory” is not an unchangeable trait, but rather a self-imposed limitation. In this post, we'll explore common misconceptions about memory, the impact (or lack thereof) of genetic factors, and how specific training methods like mnemonic techniques can unlock your true potential.

The Question: Is Poor Memory Inherited?

A common concern in discussions about memory involves individuals who believe they have a genetic memory deficit because they are told they have a poor memory. For instance, some people wonder if signs of memory issues observed in themselves and their children indicate a hereditary condition. Such questions reflect understandable worries about passing cognitive limitations to future generations. However, current research and expert opinion suggest that while genetics can influence certain cognitive abilities, the concept of hereditary "short-term memory loss" is often overly simplified.

Hutton et al. (1996) explored the accuracy of self-reported memory decline and revealed that a significant portion of participants reported memory declines even though statistically their objective memory performance had not declined (20).

True genetic impacts on short-term memory are rare (1-6). While some genetic factors may influence cognitive development, most issues associated with memory are more closely linked to environmental factors and personal habits (7) rather than an unchangeable genetic code. According to Wang & Saudino (2013) "Working memory showed significant and moderate heritability (29%, p< .05) shared environmental influences (32%, p< .05) and nonshared environmental influences (39%, p< .05)" (8).

The narrative of inevitable memory deterioration can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, leading older adults to believe that aging must bring about significant memory loss. This mindset, however, discourages engagement in activities that might help maintain and even improve cognitive function. Research has shown that regular cognitive exercises (21), sustained social connections (22), and an active lifestyle (23) can greatly mitigate the degenerative effects of aging on memory. Unfortunately, the pervasive belief in unavoidable decline (18) tends to overshadow these proactive measures, limiting the potential benefits that could be achieved through a more positive and engaged approach to cognitive health.

The Answer: Challenging Memory Misconceptions

The real story behind memory is much more optimistic than genetic determinism might suggest. Scientific research indicates that although genetics can influence certain aspects of cognitive ability, drastic limitations in short-term memory are uncommon (8). Occasional forgetfulness is not a sentence written in your DNA. Instead, the true driver of success lies in the depth and strength of long-term memory (15): a reservoir of knowledge, experience, and learned skills that shape decision-making, creativity, and problem-solving.

Short-term memory capacity is fixed, but its performance can be enhanced through mnemonic strategies, but these gains are largely task-specific and methods-dependent.

The answer seems to point to the importance of an attentional system used both for processing and storage and its use in working memory seems to differ substantially across individuals (e.g., 9-12), as well as improving with development in childhood (11,12) and declining in old age (12,13).

According to a meta-analytic review from 2013 (14), currently available working memory training programs have been investigated in a wide range of studies involving typically developing children, children with cognitive impairments (particularly ADHD), and healthy adults. The meta-analyses show clearly that these training programs give only near-transfer effects, and there is no convincing evidence that even such near-transfer effects are durable.

Genetic Factors Are Overstated

Apps like Anki stand out as some of the most compelling tools for memory enhancement, designed to help you realize your full cognitive potential. They offer personalized training programs through spaced repetition and adaptive review schedules that adjust to your individual strengths and weaknesses, guiding you through targeted exercises that build your mnemonic capabilities. Many users discover that their cognitive abilities are far less limited than they once believed; with consistent practice, the differences between an average and an exceptional memory often diminish, revealing untapped potential waiting to be activated. Ultimately, success in memory development isn’t about luck or genetics, it’s about effort, strategy, and persistence. Spaced Repetition Software (SRS) like Anki reinforces the idea that with the right tools and mindset, you can overcome any perceived innate limitations.

 

Lack of Mnemonic Practice

Despite significant advancements in our understanding of memory, many misconceptions continue to persist (18). A considerable number of people believe that they have a poor memory, even though most of us experience what can be considered normal forgetfulness. In many cases, cognitive tests reveal that our memory skills fall within the average range, contradicting our often overly negative self-perception (19). One major reason for this disconnect is the failure to recognize that memory can be enhanced by skills that improve with practice (16).

Without consistent practice and mnemonic strategies, occasional memory lapses can easily be misinterpreted as signs of permanent decline. However, personalized Spaced Repetition Software (SRS), like Anki or SuperMemo, helps individuals identify their specific weak points, recognize what they tend to forget, and determine when mnemonic techniques or other strategies might be necessary.

Many users find that, with consistent practice, the gap between what is considered “average” and “exceptional” memory performance diminishes, revealing untapped potential. Ultimately, success in memory development is not determined by luck or genetics, but by effort, strategy, and persistence, empowering individuals to overcome what might initially seem like innate limitations.

 

Key Takeaways: Empowering Your Memory

The journey toward better memory starts with challenging misconceptions and taking proactive steps. Here are the core takeaways:

  • Consult Specialists: Before accepting a diagnosis of genetic memory loss, seek multiple opinions. Memory specialists can provide insights into whether your difficulties are due to genuine cognitive issues or simply a lack of effective memory training.
  • Focus on Long-Term Memory: Remember that long-term memory is the key to achieving lasting success. Investing in your long-term memory through continuous learning and spaced repetition practice.
  • Train your memory: Just as a gardener nurtures plants through regular care and attention, your brain thrives with consistent training. Employ mnemonic devices and spaced repetition techniques to cultivate and strengthen your memory over time.

Closing Thought

In conclusion, the idea that poor memory is an unchangeable, genetically determined trait is a misconception. Instead, many of the limitations we experience are self-imposed barriers—beliefs that prevent us from harnessing the true power of our cognitive abilities. As the saying goes, "Your future rests in your hands (and your brain)." Embrace the tools and strategies available, and take control of your memory. With the right mindset and dedicated effort, you can overcome limitations and achieve a level of memory performance that you never thought possible.

By challenging these misconceptions and adopting effective training methods such as spaced repetition, you empower not only your memory but also your entire future. The potential is in your hands; start unlocking it today.

  1. Polderman TJC, Posthuma D, De Sonneville LMJ, Stins JF, Verhulst FC, Boomsma DI. Genetic analyses of the stability of executive functioning during childhood. Biological Psychology. 2007 Sep 1;76(1):11–20.
  2. Polderman TJC, Gosso MF, Posthuma D, Van Beijsterveldt TCEM, Heutink P, Verhulst FC, et al. A longitudinal twin study on IQ, executive functioning, and attention problems during childhood and early adolescence. Acta Neurol Belg. 2006 Dec;106(4):191–207.
  3. Luciano M, Wright MJ, Smith GA, Geffen GM, Geffen LB, Martin NG. Genetic Covariance Among Measures of Information Processing Speed, Working Memory, and IQ. Behav Genet. 2001 Nov 1;31(6):581–92.
  4. Lee T, Mosing MA, Henry JD, Trollor JN, Ames D, Martin NG, et al. Genetic Influences on Four Measures of Executive Functions and Their Covariation with General Cognitive Ability: The Older Australian Twins Study. Behav Genet. 2012 Jul 1;42(4):528–38.
  5. KUNTSI J, ROGERS H, SWINARD G, BÖRGER N, van der MEERE J, RIJSDIJK F, et al. Reaction time, inhibition, working memory and ‘delay aversion’ performance: genetic influences and their interpretation. Psychol Med. 2006 Nov;36(11):1613–24.
  6. Ando J, Ono Y, Wright MJ. Genetic Structure of Spatial and Verbal Working Memory. Behav Genet. 2001 Nov 1;31(6):615–24.
  7. Bernier A, Carlson SM, Whipple N. From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development. 2010 Jan;81:326–39.
  8. Wang M, Saudino KJ. Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in emotion regulation and its relation to working memory in toddlerhood. Emotion. 2013 Dec;13:1055–67.
  9. Conway AR, Cowan N, Bunting MF, Therriault DJ, Minkoff SR. A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence. 2002;30(2):163–83.
  10. Kane MJ, Hambrick DZ, Tuholski SW, Wilhelm O, Payne TW, Engle RW. The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004;133(2):189–217.
  11. Cowan N, Elliott EM, Saults JS, Morey CC, Mattox S, Hismjatullina A, et al. On the Capacity of Attention: Its Estimation and Its Role in Working Memory and Cognitive Aptitudes. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):42–100.
  12. Cowan N, Naveh-Benjamin M, Kilb A, Saults JS. Life-Span Development of Visual Working Memory: When is Feature Binding Difficult? Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):1089–102.
  13. Naveh-Benjamin M, Cowan N, Kilb A, Chen Z. Age-Related Differences in Immediate Serial Recall: Dissociating Chunk Formation and Capacity. Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):724–37.
  14. Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):270–91.
  15. Del Missier F, Mäntylä T, Hansson P, Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Nilsson LG. The Multifold Relationship Between Memory and Decision Making: An Individual-differences Study. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1344–64.
  16. Rebok GW, Langbaum JBS, Jones RN, Gross AL, Parisi JM, Spira AP, et al. Memory Training in the ACTIVE study: How Much is Needed and Who Benefits? J Aging Health. 2013 Dec;25(0):10.1177/0898264312461937.
  17. The Role of Critical Thinking and Executive Function in Misconceptions in Psychology | Murti | Jurnal Psikologi [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 22]. Available from: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/31133
  18. Furnham A. Myths and Misconceptions about Human Memory. Psychology. 2024 Oct 12;15(10):1614–26.
  19. Schmidt IW, Berg IJ, Deelman BG. Illusory Superiority in Self-Reported Memory of Older Adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. 1999 Dec 1;6(4):288–301.
  20. Rickenbach EH, Agrigoroaei S, Lachman ME. Awareness of Memory Ability and Change: (In)Accuracy of Memory Self-Assessments in Relation to Performance. J Popul Ageing. 2015 Mar 1;8(1–2):71–99.
  21. Stieger M, Lachman ME. Increases in Cognitive Activity Reduce Aging-Related Declines in Executive Functioning. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 29;12:708974.
  22. James BD, Wilson RS, Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Late-Life Social Activity and Cognitive Decline in Old Age. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Nov;17(6):998–1005.
  23. Sofi F, Valecchi D, Bacci D, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A, et al. Physical activity and risk of cognitive decline: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2011;269(1):107–17.
What are your thoughts on this article?Share your feedback